Publishing Ethics

Publishing Ethics

Wisdom Journal for Studies and Research published by the University and the Institute of Justice and Wisdom in America publishes original and refereed scientific articles, studies and research, while adhering to the principles of publishing ethics. The Code of Ethics is classified under the Publication Ethics Committee (COPE: Publication Ethics Committee), which constitutes the guiding basis for authors and researchers. From this point of view, the newspaper sought to set unified standards for the application of the laws of this ethical code.
1- DUTIES OF THE EDITOR:
• Integrity: The editor should ensure that the content of each article submitted for publication is evaluated, regardless of the author's gender, origin, religious beliefs, citizenship or political affiliation.
• Confidentiality: Confidential information of research authors should be kept by all who can see it, such as the editor, members of the editorial board, referees and other trusted parties as required by the process. arbitration. Explicit consent: Not to benefit from the results of the research of others linked to non-publishable research without the written consent of its author.
• Publication decision: the rights of others should be preserved when publishing research in the journal, and the editor-in-chief is considered primarily responsible for the decision to publish and print, based on policy. of the journal. With the utmost care to avoid defamation, slander, copyright infringement or piracy, the editor may consult with members of the editorial board to make appropriate decisions.
2- DUTIES OF EXAMINERS:
• Confidentiality: All research information must be confidential to the arbitrator, and the arbitrator seeks to maintain its confidentiality and may not disclose or discuss its content with any party other than those authorized by the editor-in-chief.
• Objectivity: The arbitrator must examine and evaluate the research addressed to him with objective evidence, and avoid arbitration on the basis of a statement of his personal point of view, and of the racist, sectarian and other aspect. .
• Identification of sources: the arbitrator will try to identify the sources and references related to the subject which have not been marginalized by the author, and will inform the editor-in-chief of any similar, similar or overlapping work with the work under arbitration.
• Conflict of interest: the arbitrator should avoid refereeing research articles with personal goals and interests, or corporate interests.

• Speed of service and respect of deadlines: The arbitrator must ensure the speed of the arbitration and respect the deadlines, and if this is not possible, he / she informs the editor-in-chief of the reasons, such as the difference in specialization. , or lack of time or others.
• Contribution to the publication decision: The referee assists the editor-in-chief and the editorial board in making publication decisions and in correcting and requesting changes to the article.
3- DUTIES OF AUTHORS:
* Preparation criteria: The author must submit original and objective research, consistent in language, form and content, in accordance with the conditions of publication in the journal, while returning the information to its owners (scientific honesty) and avoiding dealing with sensitive subjects. and immoral subjects, taste, personal, ethnic, sectarian, information False and incorrect translation of the work of others without mentioning the source of the citation in the research.
• Access and retention of data: The author must maintain the confidentiality of the data he has used in his research, and submit it at the request of the editorial board or the reviewer.
• Disclosure: The author must disclose any conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, that may affect the results and interpretation of the research, in addition to disclosing the source of any financial support for their research project.
• Article authors: the (number) of article authors should be limited to these contributors only in a broad and clear manner, both in terms of design, implementation and interpretation, with the need to specify the main author and co-authors with him only, and mention their data, universities and e-mails. With the need to be informed and the authors unanimously agree on the research.
• References and References: The research author cites the references or documentation appropriately to the terms of the review, with a list of references including books, publications, websites and other scholars cited or referred to in the review. search text.
• Originality and piracy: the author should marginalize and document his research by referring to the owners of the information he used in his research. The documentation must conform to the terms of the journal. Note that the magazine has the right to use plagiarism detection programs for works submitted for publication Error Reporting: When the author discovers errors which were contained in or in part of his research, it must immediately notify the magazine editor or publisher, and cooperate to correct the error. Repost: The author cannot submit the same research to more than one journal or conference, and this is considered unethical and unacceptable behavior.